{"id":5537,"date":"2024-07-26T12:12:10","date_gmt":"2024-07-26T06:42:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.leadindia.law\/blog\/en\/?p=5537"},"modified":"2024-07-26T12:12:11","modified_gmt":"2024-07-26T06:42:11","slug":"supreme-court-issues-guidelines-for-visual-medias-portrayal-of-people-with-disabilities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.leadindia.law\/blog\/en\/supreme-court-issues-guidelines-for-visual-medias-portrayal-of-people-with-disabilities\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Issues Guidelines For Visual Media’s Portrayal Of People With Disabilities"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\u201cDisabled Person” means someone with prolonged physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory disability. If it is coupled with other issues, it prohibits them from completely and effectively participating in society on an equal basis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Facts<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The appellant created a disability awareness group. He was disappointed by the film Aankh Micholi’s representation of people with disabilities. Sony Pictures Films India Private Limited received a legal notice opposing their film trailer. The appellant was especially disappointed by the introduction of some cinematic characters who were depicted as having disabilities. The film was released on 3\/11\/2023 and had the CBFC’U rating. The appellant also argued that the film violated the provisions of the Act related to disability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The appellant alleged that multiple healthcare issues were misrepresented and that demeaning sentences were used for characters with disabilities, including a depiction of night blindness. It was also stated that negative references were used, such as “bhulakkad baap”<\/strong> for an Alzheimer’s patient, “soundproof system” <\/strong>for a hearing-impaired individual, and “atki hui cassette” for a character with a speech impediment. The appellant sought guidelines relating to people with disability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Need A Legal Advice<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The internet is not a lawyer and neither are you. Talk to a real lawyer about your legal issue<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Talk to a Lawyer<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
\"\"<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Decision of Court<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The court held that the producers of visual media must make every effort to ensure truthful representation of a medical condition. The incorrect portrayal of an illness such as night blindness may spread misconceptions about the condition and establish preconceptions about people with such impairments, aggravating the disability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bench highlighted that visual media must attempt to depict all aspects of individuals with disabilities, highlighting not just their challenges but also their achievements, talents, and contributions to society. This balanced representation can serve to erase misconceptions and promote a more inclusive view of disability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guidelines: Visual Media’s Portrayal of People with Disabilities<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court in the case of Nipun Malhotra v.<\/strong> <\/strong>Sony Pictures Films India Private Limited<\/strong> laid down guidelines. The Court stated, “Words cultivate institutional discrimination.” “Cripple” and “spastic” have become worthless terms in society’s conceptions of people with disability. They contribute to a negative self-image while also perpetuating discriminatory attitudes and practices in society. The Court gave the following instructions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n