Loading...
I am a Manager at a US-based IT company in Bangalore. I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) immediately after raising concerns about process violations, including cross-team bypassing, work being assigned to my team without my involvement, and peer managers overriding my authority. I believe this action may be retaliatory. Key Facts: • My current manager has supervised me for less than two months. • In April, he verbally described me as a Key Performer and stated that I was not a candidate for a PIP. • Concerns I raised during one-on-one meetings were later cited as performance issues. • The PIP was issued yesterday without any prior written warnings or documented performance concerns. • The PIP contains a termination clause that becomes effective upon signing. • The Vice President declined to meet with me, and HR appears to be supporting management's position. • I have not signed the PIP. I require urgent legal advice on whether this situation could amount to retaliation under Indian law, what my rights are before signing the PIP, whether I may take medical leave while on a PIP, and how I should respond to protect my legal interests.
If the PIP was issued shortly after you raised concerns about workplace practices, you should carefully preserve all emails, messages, performance records, and communications. Do not sign any document without understanding its implications. You may submit a written response disputing incorrect allegations and seek clarification regarding the PIP. An employment lawyer can review the facts and advise whether the action appears retaliatory or procedurally unfair. For further legal assistance contact us on our helpline number.