Is prolonged provocation legally recognized for full acquittal?
Is the principle of prolonged and sustained provocation, as opposed to grave and sudden provocation, recognized under Indian law? If so, in cases involving chronic and long-drawn-out abusive situations, can minor acts (such as retaliatory verbal abuse, very minor hurt, or property damage) committed by a male victim be completely acquitted if prolonged and sustained provocation is proved in a court of law? Or does this principle only serve to mitigate the sentence without leading to complete acquittal? Please clarify with relevant case laws, if any.
Indian law usually recognizes “grave and sudden” provocation, but courts have occasionally considered prolonged abuse in reducing punishment. However, it doesn't usually lead to full acquittal. If you're accused of a minor offense due to long-term abuse, this can help reduce your sentence, not erase guilt entirely. Court will consider the full context. For further legal assistance contact us on our helpline number.
Related Questions
24x7 Help
If we fall short of your expectation in any way, let us know
Payment Trust
All refunds come with no questions asked guarantee
