Why doesn’t law protect a caring daughter-in-law’s future rights?
If a daughter-in-law has no right to claim her in-laws' property, despite staying with them for decades, why did she take care of them if they are not protecting her future? What is this double standard in law? If a daughter-in-law doesn't care for her in-laws, the law considers it wrong behavior, but if a woman spends her time caring for them, why don't the in-laws protect her future? Is the law biased against women in this regard?
Under Indian law, a daughter-in-law has no inherent rights to claim property from her in-laws unless specified by a will or a family settlement. If she has taken care of her in-laws, it is a moral obligation, not a legal one. The law doesn’t offer protection if there are no legal rights or agreements regarding property. For further legal assistance contact us on our helpline number.
Related Questions
24x7 Help
If we fall short of your expectation in any way, let us know
Payment Trust
All refunds come with no questions asked guarantee